Feedback Analysis
December 23, 2024

Are Your Feedback Analysis Methods Stopping You From Finding Data-Driven Insights?

The six most common methods of feedback analysis used by CX and insights teams, and why they might be holding you back from driving change for your customers…

Every day, customer insights professionals face the same challenge: mountains of unstructured text from surveys, social media, and staff feedback, all waiting to be transformed into meaningful action plans. But here's the problem - the very methods you're using to analyze this data might be preventing you from discovering data-driven insights that drive real change.

But how do you tackle this mountain of text analysis effectively?

Before you invest more time analysing thousands of customer comments, let's examine why the most common text analysis methods might be holding you back from discovering insights that drive real change…

The Most Common Feedback Analysis Methods

1. Manual Data Tagging

While human analysis is feasible for small datasets, it quickly becomes problematic when you need to manage multiple datasets from a range of sources. Beyond the obvious challenges of time, cost, and team morale (nobody wants to spend weeks tagging comments), manual tagging introduces:

  • Your team members tag differently, creating inconsistent data
  • Personal biases creep in, skewing your understanding
  • Mental fatigue leads to missed insights
  • New trends slip through the cracks because you're following pre-set categories

2. Cherry-Picking Individual Comments

While selecting powerful quotes helps illustrate your findings, building your entire analysis on individual comments is like trying to understand an ocean by looking at a single drop of water. You're left with:

  • No way to prove how widespread issues really are
  • Inability to show whether problems are getting better or worse
  • Missing crucial context about overall customer sentiment
  • Reduced credibility when presenting to decision-makers who need hard data

In a world where big bosses need numbers to back up their decision, a one-off post from hotguy2739 will only get you so far.

3. Using Built-in Text Analytics from Major Platforms

Major survey and social listening platforms excel at numbers, but their text analysis is like trying to understand Shakespeare through a calculator. Their algorithms:

  • Miss crucial context in customer language
  • Can't detect sarcasm ("Great, another broken product!")
  • Stumble over industry jargon your customers use daily
  • Get confused by common misspellings and abbreviations
  • Treat every mention of a word as having the same meaning

This is why many organizations use specialised text analytics tools alongside their existing platforms.

4. Building Your Own Neural Network

Creating an in-house text analysis solution sounds appealing until you realise what it actually requires:

  • 12-18 months of development time before seeing any results
  • Continuous updates to keep up with evolving language
  • Dedicated team of linguists and developers
  • Extensive testing to eliminate systematic errors
  • Regular retraining as new data comes in

We’ve got years of experience with linguistics and AI, we’ve made all kinds of mistakes and misfires on our way to building a platform that can read and understand text, isn’t biased and provides insights out of the box.

If you decide this is for you, then do reach out to us, we’d be delighted to help. But for most organisations, homemade NLP isn’t worth the stress.

5. Word Clouds

Though visually appealing, word clouds strip away all context - and context is everything in language analysis. The same word can mean completely different things:

  • "Wicked" problem vs "wicked" awesome
  • "Sick" with illness vs "sick" design
  • "Cool" temperature vs "cool" feature

Word clouds strip away all meaning from customer feedback, miss critical phrases and word combinations and they don’t get to the actual crux of the problem customers describe, providing no way to gain actionable insights.  Simply counting word frequency won't deliver meaningful insights, word clouds should not be a key part of your CX strategy in 2025. 

6. Doing Nothing

Surprisingly, this is also a common approach. Many organizations let valuable text data gather dust, missing opportunities to:

  • Understand customer pain points
  • Track sentiment trends
  • Spot early warning signs of emerging problems
  • Spot opportunities for quick wins
  • Track of changing customer needs
  • Make decisions based on evidence rather than gut feel

What’s the Best Feedback Analysis Method?

If you're reading this, you're already ahead of many organizations in recognising the value of your text data. But are you getting everything you could from your qualitative text feedback?

Relying on manual feedback analysis can feel like running uphill—slow, exhausting, and often leading to frustratingly incomplete insights.

It barely scratches the surface of what's possible, which is why customer-centric businesses are turning to AI-powered tools to uncover deeper insights in their text data that would be impossible through manual analysis. To truly enhance your customer experience you have to have a clear way of turning your qualitative text data into actionable insights. 

Want to discover what these options are? You can download our buyers guide for free which walks you through the various AI-powered feedback tools and how to pick the right one for your current situation.

Related blogs

Join our CX Newsletter